Software Supply Chain Security
Know your software risk before it becomes an incident. Binary analysis shows what is inside the firmware and software you run, before it deploys.
Software declarations are not software evidence. An attestation says what should be in a product. Binary analysis of the compiled artifact shows what is. That gap is where supply chain risk lives.
Binary analysis exists elsewhere. So does provenance. Only Dragos pairs them with xOT threat intelligence, placing every finding against the adversaries that target it and the assets that run it.
An SBOM is an inventory of the components inside a piece of software. xOT devices are long-lived, rarely patched, and increasingly built on open-source components. Without an SBOM, defenders cannot answer which assets contain a vulnerable component when a CVE is published.
A vendor SBOM describes what the vendor believes it shipped. Binary analysis examines the compiled artifact itself and routinely surfaces components, credentials, and misconfigurations that attestations miss. The gap between the two is where supply chain risk sits.
It adds unreviewed components. Code produced with AI tooling pulls in libraries and dependencies no developer on the project vetted. 44% of AI-generated code fails security testing, a rate unchanged across four years and 100+ models.
Executive Order 14028, the EU Cyber Resilience Act, NERC CIP, NIS2, and TSA security directives increasingly require organizations to demonstrate what is inside the software running their operations. SBOM generation and audit-ready documentation support each of these frameworks.